Assignment Three: Group Report and presentation (Group size 4) Due date: 6th October, 2019 – 11.55 PM – Group report & submission of presentation documents via Canvas. Commencing Week 9- Group presentations (in-class) Length: 2000 word written report (Word count excludes executive summary and appendices), and around 15 power point slides for presentation. Worth: 35% (20% for Written Report and 15% for Presentation) Working in small groups of 4 (to be allocated), you will explore topics covered under: ‘The Core of Critical Approaches’. Your group is expected to undertake the following tasks: Choose a topic, as the focus for this assignment. This can be any theme or point of interest within the following: Organisational misbehavior Management of stress Individual well-being Find a relevant video clip to present as part of your presentation (such as a short segment from a film, or a short YouTube video) in which this topic or theme is evident, and address the following questions: o What are the major themes in your clip? o Identify and explain the consequences, impacts and effects of managerial prerogative choosing relevant examples from your video. o How does this example translate into a workplace context? o As Managers, do you have choices in relation to your own (self) perspective that you would like to address when managing individual behaviours? What are the (managerial) implications? o How might your group go about managing a similar situation in future? o For your written report, use a minimum of 12-refereed Journal articles. If needed, additional instructions will be provided to students in class regarding oral presentations. It is your responsibility to check the due date of your oral presentation. Rubrics marking criteria: Group ReportGroup Report Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeExecutive summary (10%) Overview of the Report ( not more than a paragraph 2.0 to >1.6 PtsHigh Distinction >80%Exceeded expectations 1.6 to >1.4 PtsDistinction >70 %Exceeded expectations 1.4 to >1.2 PtsCredit > 60%Met Expectations 1.2 to >1.0 PtsPass>50 %Met Expectations 1.0 to >0 PtsFailDid Not Meet Expectations 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeIntroduction (20%)Aims/objectives/Scope and structure 3.0 to >2.4 PtsHigh Distinction >80%Exceeded expectations 2.4 to >2.1 PtsDistinction >70 %Exceeded expectations 2.1 to >1.8 PtsCredit > 60%Met Expectations 1.8 to >1.5 PtsPass>50 %Met Expectations 1.5 to >0 PtsFailDid Not Meet Expectations 3.0 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAnalysis and Discussion (50%)Justification and application of the concepts and integration of theory with the use of the example from the video clip chosen Demonstration of critical analysis and evaluation through appropriate arguments Demonstration of originality and creativity through critiquing of relevant academic sources with adequate referencing 10.0 to >8.0 PtsHigh Distinction >80%Exceeded expectations 8.0 to >7.0 PtsDistinction >70 %Exceeded expectations 7.0 to >6.0 PtsCredit > 60%Met Expectations 6.0 to >5.0 PtsPass>50 %Met Expectations 5.0 to >0 PtsFailDid Not Meet Expectations 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeConclusion (20%)Summary of key points 2.0 to >1.6 PtsHigh Distinction >80%Exceeded expectations 1.6 to >1.4 PtsDistinction >70 %Exceeded expectations 1.4 to >1.2 PtsCredit > 60%Met Expectations 1.2 to >1.0 PtsPass>50 %Met Expectations 1.0 to >0 PtsFailDid Not Meet Expectations 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeReferencing (15%)Harvard style – Consistent (both in-text and in the reference list 3.0 to >2.4 PtsHigh Distinction >80%Exceeded expectations ~~~For this or similar assignment papers~~~