Individual Code HI5017
Individual Title Managerial Accounting
Impost Type Enactment
Impost Title Individual Enactment
Aim of the impost (with ULO
Mapping) Wards are required to obvious their mind of the aim and description of superintendence accounting schemes, distinctly consumeing schemes and its descriptionfulness in friendly managers frame sensible decisions. You are to critically evaluate the examine (using life profession) to analyse the correctionful description of superintendence accounting schemes by synchronous companies, in stipulations of their relation to the real-life companies’ decision-making by managers and amiable-fortune of calling goals (ULO 1,
3 & 4)
Weight 30% of the completion imposts
Completion Marks 30
Word condition Referable over than 3,000 expression. Gladden description “word count” and comprise in the enactment.
Due Limit Week 9 Thursday 17th of September at 11.59 p.m.
Meekness Guidelines • Entire performance must be connectted on Blackboard by the due limit along with a consummated Enactment Clothe Page.
• The enactment must be in MS Word cemat, no spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on entire filthy sides of your page with misapply exception headings and page gum.
• Regard sources must be cited in the citation of the declaration, and inventoryed misapplyly at the meaning in a regard inventory using Harvard connectencing diction.
• It is the responsibility of the ward who is connectting the performance, to determine that the performance is in deed her/his admit performance. Incorporating another’s performance or ideas into undivided’s admit performance externally misapply acknowledgement is an academic sin. Wards should connect entire enactments ce plagiarism checking on Blackboard precedently developed meekness in the question. Ce further details, gladden connect to the Individual Outline and Ward Handbook.
HI5017 MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT T2 2020
Individual Enactment Favoringations
Purpose:
This enactment boon at obviousing your mind of the aim and description of superintendence accounting schemes, in point consumeing schemes, and its descriptionfulness in friendly managers frame sensible decisions. You are to critically evaluate the examine (using life profession) to analyse the correctionful description of superintendence accounting schemes by synchronous companies, in stipulations of their relation to the real-life companies’ decision-making by managers and amiable-fortune of calling goals.
Enactment Business: You are required to precede a examine inquiry and critically retrospect a consumeing scheme in this enactment.
Part A
Divert ONE of the consumeing schemes thoughtful in this individual from the inventory lowerneath, and confutation the questions that follow:
• Job Consumeing
• Process Consumeing
• Operation Consumeing (Hybrid Consumeing)
• Activity-fixed Consumeing (ABC)
Questions:
1. Little argue the features of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme. (3 marks)
2. Demonstrate 2 favoring Australian companies that your unconnectedd consumeing scheme is agreeable ce, and interpret why. (3 marks)
3. Argue span possible descriptions of the consume referableice ce decision-making, to the managers in each of the 2 organisations unconnectedd in Q2 over. (3 marks)
Part B
Divert undivided peer retrospected life expression (from any dominion) on the: Description of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme in a real-life organisation (i.e. a case-fixed experimental examine). The expression should be published among 2005 – 2020. Divert your expression solely succeeding you accept approximationed and retrospected various apt profession, and then divert the best expression that procure confutation the questions lowerneath.
Questions:
1. Fixed on your unconnectedd consumeing expression, little summarise how the consumeing scheme was prepared and implemented in your real-life organisation. (3 marks)
2. Fixed on your unconnectedd consumeing expression, did the consumeing scheme in the examine gratify the features argueed in
Part A (Q1)? Why or why referable? Comprise examples in your confutation from your consumeing expression. (5 marks)
3. Fixed on your unconnectedd consumeing expression, how descriptionful was the consume referableice to the inside descriptionrs in theorganisation? Argue with examples from your consumeing expression. (5 marks)
4. Fixed on your examine findings, recite span clew lessons that would instruct synchronous organisationsencircling the correctionful description of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme. (5 marks)
Additional Referableice:
a) You are encouraged to divert the life expression from the subjoined Accounting and Superintendence
Accounting Lifes:
Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Life;
Life of Superintendence Accounting Research
Life of Applied Superintendence Accounting Research
b) You can approximation these lifes in ProQuest Postulatesbase by clicking on the over be-mixeds. Log in details ce ProQuest are – Descriptionrname: Holmes2004; Password: Holmes. These lifes can besides be approximationed via the ProQuest Postulatesbase be-mixed profitable via the Ward Login page in the Holmes website. You can besides description Google Scholar. Don’t description Google.
Enactment Structure:
The declaration should comprise the subjoined components:
a. Enactment clothe page explicitly stating your cconsummate and ward number
b. Abstract (undivided passage)
c. Table of contents
d. A illiberal commencement or overview of what the declaration is encircling
e. Body of the enactment with misapply exception headings
f. Conclusion
g. Inventory of Regards.
Your unconnectedd life expression must be uploaded (as a unconnected PDF polish) individualedly with your enactment (as a MS WORD polish cemat) in Blackboard lower the folder Individual Enactment .
5 marks procure be deducted if you do referable connect the life expression with your enactment.
Academic Rectitude
Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding Academic Rectitude, as Academic Rectitude is consummate to maintaining academic sort and the genius of Holmes’ graduates. Accordingly, entire impost businesss want to comply with academic rectitude guidelines. Table 1 identifies the six categories of Academic Rectitude breaches. If you accept any questions encircling Academic Rectitude issues cognate to your impost businesss, gladden care-restraint your lecturer or preceptor ce apt connectencing guidelines and maintenance instrument. Many of these instrument can besides be ground through the Examine Sills be-mixed on Blackboard.
Academic Rectitude breaches are a thoughtful sin punishable by penalties that may collocate from abatement of marks, insufficiency of the impost business or individual confused, suspension of line enrolment, or cancellation of line enrolment.
Table 1: Six categories of Academic Rectitude breaches
Plagiarism Reproducing the performance of someundivided else externally attribution. When a ward connects their admit performance on multiple occasions this is knadmit as self-plagiarism.
Collusion Performanceing with undivided or over other people to consummate an enactment, in a practice that is referable authorised.
Copying Reproducing and connectting the performance of another ward, with or externally their familiarity. If a ward fails to seize serious precautions to obviate their admit ancient performance from being copied, this may besides be considered an sin.
Impersonation Fabricationly exhibiting undividedself, or winning someundivided else to exhibit as undividedself, in an in-person probation.
Contract imposture Contracting a third margin to consummate an impost business, generally in change ce coin or other fashion of reimbursement.
Postulates untrue and misentry Manipulating or inventing postulates with the eager of maintenanceing fabrication conclusions, including manipulating images.
Source: INQAAHE, 2020
Marking Criteria
Marking Criteria Weighting
Part A
1. Little argue the features of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme. 3%
2. Demonstrate 2 favoring Australian organisations that your unconnectedd consumeing scheme is agreeable to, and interpret why. 3%
3. Argue the possible descriptions of the consume referableice ce decision-making, to the managers in each of the 2 organisations unconnectedd in Q2 over. 3%
Part B
1. Fixed on your unconnectedd consumeing expression, little summarise how the consumeing scheme was prepared and implemented in your real-life organisation. 3%
2. Fixed on your unconnectedd consumeing expression, did the consumeing scheme in the examine gratify the features argueed in Part A (Q1)? Why or why referable? Comprise examples in your confutation from your consumeing expression. 5%
3. Fixed on your unconnectedd consumeing expression, how descriptionful was the consume referableice to the inside descriptionrs in the organisation? Argue with examples from your consumeing expression. 5%
4. Fixed on your examine findings, recite span clew lessons that would instruct synchronous organisations encircling the correctionful description of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme. 5%
Overentire Exhibitation of Enactment 3%
TOTAL Weight 30%
Marking Rubric
Praiseworthy Very Amiable Amiable Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Part A
Little argue the features of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme. (3 marks) (2.1 – 3 marks) Exhibit an praiseworthy argueion of the features of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme.
(1.9 – 2 marks) Exhibit a very amiable argueion of the features of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme. (1.6 – 1.8 marks)
Exhibit a amiable argueion of the features of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme. (1.1 – 1.5marks) Exhibit a serious argueion of the features of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme. (0 – 1 marks)
Unable to interpret the features of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme.
Demonstrate 2 favoring Australian organisations that your unconnectedd consumeing scheme is agreeable to, and interpret why. (3 marks) (2.1 – 3 marks) 2 favoring Australian organisations attested that are serviceable to your unconnectedd consumeing scheme with obvious, short compelling description to clear it. (1.9 – 2 marks) 2 favoring Australian organisations attested that are serviceable to your unconnectedd consumeing scheme with very amiable description to clear it. (1.6 – 1.8 marks) 2 favoring Australian organisations attested that are serviceable to your unconnectedd consumeing scheme with amiable description to clear it. (1.1 – 1.5marks) 2 favoring Australian organisations attested that are serviceable to your unconnectedd consumeing scheme with distant description to clear it. (0 – 1 marks)
Unable to demonstrate 2 favoring Australian organisations that are serviceable to your unconnectedd consumeing scheme and to clear it.
Argue the possible descriptions of the consume referableice ce decisionmaking, to the managers in each of the 2 organisations unconnectedd in Q2 over.
(3 marks) (2.1 – 3 marks) Obvious, short, compelling argueion of the possible descriptions of the consume referableice ce decision-making, to the managers in each of the 2 organisations unconnectedd (1.9 – 2 marks)
A very amiable argueion of the possible descriptions of the consume referableice ce decision-making, to the managers in each of the 2 organisations unconnectedd (1.6 – 1.8 marks)
A amiable argueion of the possible descriptions of the consume referableice ce decision-making, to the managers in each of the 2 organisations unconnectedd (1.1 – 1.5marks) Distant argueion of the possible descriptions of the consume referableice ce decision-making, to the managers in each of the 2 organisations unconnectedd (0 – 1 marks) Unable to exhibit a fair argueion of the possible descriptions of the consume referableice ce decision-making, to the managers in each of the 2 organisations unconnectedd, or confusing.
Part B
Fixed on your unconnectedd consumeing expression, little summarise how the consumeing scheme was prepared and (2.1 – 3 marks) Exhibit an praiseworthy argueion of how the (1.9 – 2 marks) Exhibit a very amiable argueion of how the (1.6 – 1.8 marks)
Exhibit a amiable argueion of how the consumeing (1.1 – 1.5marks) Exhibit a serious argueion of how the (0 – 1 marks)
Unable to interpret how the consumeing scheme was
HI5017 MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT T2 2020
Page 7 of 8
implemented in your real-life organisation. (3 marks)
costing scheme was prepared and implemented in your real-life organisation fixed on your consumeing expression.
costing scheme was prepared and implemented in your real-life organisation fixed on your consumeing expression. scheme was prepared and implemented in your real-life organisation fixed on your consumeing expression. consumeing scheme was prepared and implemented in your real-life organisation fixed on your consumeing expression. prepared and implemented in your real-life organisation fixed on your consumeing expression, or confusing.
Fixed on your unconnectedd consumeing expression, did the consumeing scheme in the examine gratify the features argueed in Part A (Q1)? Why or why referable? Comprise examples in your confutation from your
costing expression. (5 marks)
(4.1 – 5 marks) Obvious, short, compelling argueion on whether the consumeing scheme in the examine gratify the features argueed in Part A (Q1) with examples supposing from your consumeing expression. (3.6 – 4 marks) Exhibit a very amiable argueion on whether the consumeing scheme in the examine gratify the features argueed in Part A (Q1) with examples supposing from your consumeing expression. (3.1 – 3.5 marks)
Exhibit a amiable argueion on whether the consumeing scheme in the examine gratify the features argueed in Part A (Q1) with examples supposing from your consumeing expression. (2.1 – 3 marks) Exhibit a serious argueion on whether the consumeing scheme in the examine gratify the features argueed in Part A (Q1) with examples supposing from your consumeing expression. (0 – 2 marks) Unable to interpret whether the consumeing scheme in the examine gratify the features argueed in Part A (Q1) with bankruptcy of examples supposing from your consumeing expression, or confusing,
Fixed on your unconnectedd consumeing expression, how descriptionful was the consume referableice to the inside descriptionrs in the organisation? Argue with examples from your consumeing expression. (5 marks) (4.1 – 5 marks) Exhibit an praiseworthy argueion of how descriptionful the consume referableice was to the inside descriptionrs in the organisation with examples from your consumeing expression. (3.6 – 4 marks) Exhibit a very amiable argueion of how descriptionful the consume referableice was to the inside descriptionrs in the organisation with examples from your consumeing expression. (3.1 – 3.5 marks)
Exhibit a amiable argueion of how descriptionful the consume referableice was to the inside descriptionrs in the organisation with examples from your consumeing expression. (2.1 – 3 marks) Exhibit a serious argueion of how descriptionful the consume referableice was to the inside descriptionrs in the organisation with examples from your consumeing expression. (0 – 2 marks)
Unable to interpret how descriptionful the consume referableice was to the inside descriptionrs in the organisation with examples from your consumeing expression, or confusing.
Fixed on your examine findings, recite span clew lessons that would instruct synchronous organisations encircling the correctionful description of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme. (5 marks) (4.1 – 5 marks) Obvious, short, compelling span clew lessons that would instruct synchronous organisations encircling the correctionful description of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme. (3.6 – 4 marks) A very amiable span clew lessons that would instruct synchronous organisations encircling the correctionful description of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme (3.1 – 3.5 marks) A amiable span clew lessons that would instruct synchronous organisations encircling the correctionful description of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme (2.1 – 3 marks)
An distant span clew lessons that would instruct synchronous organisations encircling the correctionful description of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme (0 – 2 marks)
Unable to exhibit span clew lessons that would instruct synchronous organisations encircling the correctionful description of your unconnectedd consumeing scheme, or confusing.
HI5017 MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT T2 2020
Page 8 of 8
Overentire Exhibitation (3 marks) (2.1 – 3 marks)
Comprise entire elements and is very well-behaved-mannered-behaved-behaved exhibited. Writing runs explicitly and exceptions are be-mixeded very effectively. Connectencing is laudable. English is descriptiond very effectively and error-free. (1.9 – 2 marks) Comprise entire elements and is well-behaved-mannered-behaved-behaved exhibited. Writing runs explicitly and exceptions are be-mixeded effectively. Connectencing is of a noble type. English is descriptiond effectively with very rare errors exhibit. (1.6 – 1.8 marks)
Comprise entire elements and is generally exhibited misapplyly. Writing chiefly runs well-behaved-mannered-behaved-behaved and exceptions are be-mixeded. Connectencing is in correspondence with guidelines. English is descriptiond effectively with rare errors exhibit. (1.1 – 1.5marks) Comprise most elements and is distantly exhibited. Writing casually does referable run explicitly leaving the pamphlet to appear ambiguous in areas. Connectencing is slightly in correspondence with guidelines. Basic English is descriptiond with some errors exhibit. (0 – 1 marks)
Bankruptcy clew elements and is poorly exhibited. Writing does referable run explicitly leaving the pamphlet to appear ambiguous. Connectencing is referable in correspondence with apt guidelines. Basic English is descriptiond with errors exhibit.
Completion Marks (30) /30
HI5017 MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT T2 2020

~~~For this or similar assignment papers~~~