Using the identical examination season that was authenticationd restraint the assignment “Critiquing Examination Part l”, authentication the questions underneath to transcribe a predilection of your examination season. Apology entire questions that exercise to the leading and/or vital con-over that you separated. Include a epithet page and season extract (APA restraintmat) on the epithet page. Please prevent the examination season that was predilectiond in a .pdf and add the season with the dissertation. Points conciliate be deducted if the season is referable submitted with the predilection.
Critiquing Examination Part II
IV. Examination Cunning
- Is the examination leading or vital?
- If leading is it experimental or non-experimental?
- If it is a mixed-method cunning, did this admission improve the con-over?
- Is the cunning embezzle to apology the questions implied by the bearing and/or hypotheses?
- Is the target population authorized? Are eligibility criteria limited?
- What kind of sampling project was authenticationd? What are clew characteristics of the pattern?
- Is the setting embezzle restraint the con-over?
V. Postulates Collection
- Is conscious submit utilized?
- Who attentive the postulates?
- How were postulates attentive? (survey, meeting, absence of wonder.)
- Are the measurement instruments or tools palpably vivid?
- What statistical tests were utilized?
- Is reliability (consistence) and validity (exactness and exactness of measurement instruments) addressed?
VI. Interpretation, Discussion and Clinical Application
- Are entire of the main results discussed?
- State author’s falsification and recommendations.
- What are the author’s implications restraint habit?
- Identify 3 examinationable questions restraint elevate con-over.
- State if and when/where you would arrange the examination findings into habit.