5/20/2019 Enactment 1: Systematizeic Examination Critique
https://lethbridge.instructure.com/courses/17491/assignments/178011?module_item_id=884431 1/3
Enactment 1: Systematizeic Examination Critique
截止时间 6月15日, 23:59 之前 得分 10
提交 一个文本输入框或一份上传文件
可用 5月6日 0:00 至 8月9日 23:59 3 个月
提交作业
Value: 10%
Due: End of Week 6
Instructions
Purpose
The intention of this enactment is to critique a Systematizeic Examination reflect in human
development.
1. Select ONE of the subjoined PDFs coercion this enactment:
0 to 2 years.PDF
6 to 11 years.PDF
20 to 40 years.PDF
40 to 60 years.PDF
prenatal to race.PDF
2. Coercion each eldership systematize you excel ascertain a pdf with separate OR brace ‘classic examination’ studies.
It potentiality be a cheerful-tempered-tempered fancy to critique them integral precedently choosing. Choose separate pdf and
follow the instructions beneath.
3. Your enactment is to interpret, conceive, and sift-canvass the integral pdf according to the
criteria/rubric beneath.
4. Plan on 4-5 pages, plus heading and regard page, save be apprised that:
it would be very unmanageable to adequately sift-canvass the symbolical in short than 2 pages
5/20/2019 Enactment 1: Systematizeic Examination Critique
https://lethbridge.instructure.com/courses/17491/assignments/178011?module_item_id=884431 2/3
if the monograph is longer than 6 pages, you are probably set-downting in further employment than
you want to coercion 10% of your gradation
5. In regulate to take reputation, your monograph must be submitted in an electronic
format in the enactment “attachment” link/submission box. This shapes it
possible coercion your schoolmistress to toil your employment through a plagiarism bridleer and
grader.
6. This is an oration. An oration embraces an presentation; A illiberal overaim and narrates
the intention of your monograph (i.e., ‘This monograph excel sift-canvass…’) and conclusion
(summarizes integral the ascertainings). You’d be surprised how divers populace do no referable
embrace or inferiorstand how to do these ! Examination orations conservation 3rd peculiar (so don’t conservation
“I”).
7. Access the online APA Guide from the LC homepage: APA Novice Guide
(http://www.lethbridgecollege.ca/sites/default/files/apaguide.pdf)
Rubric
Your monograph must cloak the subjoined symbolical
(hint-conservation these as headings coercion your monograph):
Summary: incorporate the reflect in your
acknowledge articulation
/3
Critique: warrant the strengths and
weaknesses of the reflect as they recount to
the interrogation substance examinationed. I excel post a
messeldership in the Announcements on ‘how to
critique’. Be firm to bridle it
/3
Recent studies: ascertain and sift-canvass a
partiality of brace other mate critiqueed
examination studies that conclude behind the systematizeic
study. How do they increase our inferiorstandledge
/2
5/20/2019 Enactment 1: Systematizeic Examination Critique
https://lethbridge.instructure.com/courses/17491/assignments/178011?module_item_id=884431 3/3
of the material? I would love to descry
demographics, how the examination was
conducted, and quenchedcomes of each examination
reflect to take generous marks
The enactment should be in APA coercionmat
with cheerful-tempered-tempered spelling and grammar:
heading page: fascinate embrace a Toilning Head
(descry APA Guide)
peldership computes
double spaced, 1” margins, 12 pt font,
Times New Roman
correctly coercionmatted citations, regard
page
/2
TOTAL: /10

5/20/2019 Enactment Instructions Info Sheet: 19SM SOC-1167-D02 Sociology of Aging
https://lethbridge.instructure.com/courses/17609/pages/assignment-instructions-info-sheet?module_item_id=893288 1/6
Enactment Instructions Info Sheet
The intention of this enactment requires each novice to defense separate of the subjoined examination
questions through:
1. Summarizing and critiquing an academic chronicle proviso.
2. Sift-canvassing socioargumentative concepts, theories, and gregarious trends.
3. Presenting enactment on the Sift-canvassion Coercionum. Keep in remembrance you excel besides be
required to rejoin to other novices’ postings. Your responses excel be evaluated
as deal-quenched of your sift-canvassion deal-outicipation gradation coercion the passage.
Examination Interrogations:
1. Vigor Wariness: From a cross-cultural perspective parallel Canada’s vigor wariness
(or housing) policies/outcomes to those of another province and shape
recommendations coercion decent the vigor wariness/housing of Canadian seniors. OR
From a subrefinement perspective discuss the vigor wariness (or housing) wants of
seniors from a deal-outicular Canadian subrefinement and shape recommendations coercion
decent the vigor wariness/housing of this subsystematize of Canadian seniors.
2. Finances and Economics: From a cross-cultural perspective parallel
Canada’s pension policies/outcomes to those of another province and shape
recommendations coercion decent the inconclude deposit of Canadian seniors. OR
From a subrefinement perspective discuss the financial wants of seniors from a
detail Canadian subrefinement and shape recommendations coercion decent the
financial instituteation of this subsystematize of Canadian seniors.
3. Retirement and Employment: From a cross-cultural perspective parallel Canada’s
retirement/employment policies/outcomes to those of another province and shape
recommendations coercion decent the retirement/employment options of Canadian seniors.
OR From a subrefinement perspective discuss the retirement/employment wants of seniors
from a deal-outicular Canadian subrefinement and shape recommendations coercion decent
the retirement/employment options of this subsystematize of Canadian seniors
4. Leifirm and Recreation: From a cross-cultural perspective parallel Canada’s
leisure/recreation policies/outcomes to those of another province and shape
5/20/2019 Enactment Instructions Info Sheet: 19SM SOC-1167-D02 Sociology of Aging
https://lethbridge.instructure.com/courses/17609/pages/assignment-instructions-info-sheet?module_item_id=893288 2/6
recommendations coercion decent the leisure/recreation options of Canadian seniors.
OR From a subrefinement perspective discuss the leisure/recreation wants of
seniors from a deal-outicular Canadian subrefinement and shape recommendations coercion
decent the leisure/recreation options of this subsystematize of Canadian seniors.
5. Gregarious Livelihood: From a cross-cultural perspective parallel Canada’s origin
livelihood policies/outcomes to those of another province and shape recommendations
coercion decent the gregarious livelihood of Canadian seniors. OR From a subculture
perspective discuss the origin livelihood wants of seniors from a deal-outicular Canadian
subrefinement and shape recommendations coercion decent the gregarious livelihood of this
subsystematize of Canadian seniors.
6. Death and Dying: From a cross-cultural perspective parallel Canada’s
death/dying policies/practices to those of another province and shape
recommendations coercion decent this usage coercion Canadian seniors. OR From a
subrefinement perspective discuss the death/dying traditions of a deal-outicular Canadian
subrefinement and shape recommendations coercion decent the usages of this subgroup
of Canadian seniors.
Topics excel be separated on a principal conclude, principal benefitd plea; and the compute of
students per interrogation excel be detested established upon the compute of novices in the
class. Dates coercion each donation are scheduled to be accordant with passage
topics and modules.
You are expected to conservation three unanalogous fountains in completing this
assignment.
1. Separate sociological/aging chronicle proviso from a creditable academic fountain
published in the ultimate 10 years and a partiality of 3 pages in tediousness. This proviso
should benefit as the plea of your segregation and nice segregation. This proviso
should be submitted with your monograph and regardd in APA coercionmat in your written
employment and regard page.
2. The quotation body (or another socioargumentative fountain) should be applied and regardd
to livelihood the socioargumentative concepts or theories you dedicate to your examination
question.
5/20/2019 Enactment Instructions Info Sheet: 19SM SOC-1167-D02 Sociology of Aging
https://lethbridge.instructure.com/courses/17609/pages/assignment-instructions-info-sheet?module_item_id=893288 3/6
3. A beloved proviso from the beloved instrument (newspaper, store, or internet)
published among the late year that sift-canvasses beloved socioargumentative trends should
be applied and regardd in livelihood of your examination interrogation.
Proviso Requirements and Coercionmat
It is ocean that your proviso originates from a creditable socioargumentative fountain that
supports advice that is experimental and established upon the expertise of gregarious
scientists. Recommended fountains coercion the examination enactment embrace:The
SocINDEX with Generous Quotation, Academic Search Complete, or Academic Separate File
from Buchanan Library’s on-line database. You may wish to pronounce to a librarian to
assist you with your examination. The proviso must besides be apt to your examination
question. Marks excel besides be awarded coercion your exertion and employment you set-dacknowledge in to ascertaining
an proviso (steady tediousness of three or further pages) and in rejoining to the
enactment interrogations (steady tediousness of separate peldership coercion each minority). Your employment
should be in APA coercionmat using alienate heading page, referencing of fountains,
regard page, typed font, and spacing.
Lethbridge College’s APA Novice Guide (6 Ed.) is serviceable online at:
http://www.lethbridgecollege.ca/sites/default/files/apaguide.pdf
(http://www.lethbridgecollege.ca/sites/default/files/apaguide.pdf) . Be firm to conservation
disentangled terse articulation.
Note that you may referable ascertain the unblemished proviso that addresses integral designs of your
examination interrogation, such as a cross-cultural similarity of your interrogation.
However, by combining your quotation body and the beloved instrument unitedly with
your proviso, may conform you with the compulsory advice coercion a crosscultural similarity.
Structure and Agreement Style
This enactment requires you to defense a examination interrogation through a segregation
and segregation of a mate-reviewed proviso; and collision of socioargumentative concepts,
theories, gregarious effects or trends livelihooded by an proviso from the beloved instrument.
The structure of these designs accordingly must accordingly hold integral minoritys unitedly
focused on defenseing the examination interrogation. Coercion each of the minoritys, it is
ocean to be disentangled encircling the interrogation to which you are rejoining. Headings
th
5/20/2019 Enactment Instructions Info Sheet: 19SM SOC-1167-D02 Sociology of Aging
https://lethbridge.instructure.com/courses/17609/pages/assignment-instructions-info-sheet?module_item_id=893288 4/6
using the enactment interrogations excel augment your structure. As this is a coercionmal
enactment your langueldership must be coercionmal, disentangled, and terse.
Segregation of Proviso (encircling 1 peldership or 275 articulation)
Your segregation should start with an presentation. Reflect what interrogation(s) or
issues the constructor is attempting to address; or what preceding examination prompted the
authors to precede their reflect? In other articulation, what is the intention of this proviso?
Then incorporate in your acknowledge articulation what the constructor is byword by illiberally stating
his/her ocean designs. This may envelop going past the methodic axioms and descrying the
whole draw or subject. Coercion effect, Durkheim’s reflect on suicide is referable true encircling
comparing suicide rates betwixt Catholics and Protestants, save it is on how separate’s
gregarious conquotation influences separate manner.
Nice Segregation of Proviso (encircling 1 peldership or 275 articulation)
The segregation of your proviso through the subjoined interrogations should disentangledly elucidate
and livelihood your designs. It is referable sufficient to barely utter your proviso is philosophical and
objective; elucidate your coercionced through demonstrating your conceiveing of
sociology examination concepts.
Evidence: Analyzing an proviso envelops looking at the species of the indication.
Indication can be philosophical or non-scientific. Non-philosophical indication may be established
upon aim, anecdotal effects, or argumentative coercionced. Philosophical indication is
empirically established using separate of the four ocean examination methods, including
experiments, surveys, contenteded segregation, or scope examination. If you conservation a examinationestablished proviso disentangledly narrate the species of the indication and the species of the reflect (if
applicable). Keep in remembrance that referable integral provisos are examination established. Some may be
established upon aim or anecdotal indication. Be firm to disentangledly portray the species of
the indication.
Design of aim: Integral gregarious scientists (and integral populace) keep a design of aim or injury. A
design of aim may be inapprehensive of separate’s refinement, gender, gregarious systematize, or
race/ethnicity. It may be openly methodic or mysterious and apt or irapt to what
the constructor is byword. Separate’s design of aim may image a presumptive advent. Coercion
example, does the constructor’s perspective image a gregarious fight, structural negotiative,
symbolic interaction, or feminist presumptive perspective? Sometimes the sponsoring
5/20/2019 Enactment Instructions Info Sheet: 19SM SOC-1167-D02 Sociology of Aging
https://lethbridge.instructure.com/courses/17609/pages/assignment-instructions-info-sheet?module_item_id=893288 5/6
structure or chronicle itself images a deal-outicular design of aim. Be disentangled that in this
context, design of aim does referable balance the constructor’s hyposubject or subject.
Strengths and weaknesses of the proviso: Reflect the examination methodology
used and its inbred strengths and weaknesses. Is there any actual indication or does
the indication presented adequately livelihood the constructor’s conclusions? Reflect the
author’s assumptions, is it steady? Reflect the constructor’s injury, design of aim, or
presumptive perspective; is it honorable and reasonably objective; does it adequately elucidate
the examination interrogation? Be firm to disentangledly portray twain the strengths and weakness
of your proviso. Does the proviso excel in achieving its overintegral intention?
Do you conform or disconform with the constructor? Why or why referable? Here is your
chance to surrender your design of aim on this examination interrogation. Be firm to disentangledly
portray your design of aim and your reasons coercion that collocation.
Socioargumentative Concepts/Plea and Gregarious Effects/Trends (encircling 1 peldership or 275
words)
You are expected to prove your conceiveing of the broader effects
represented by your examination interrogation and proviso. Broader effects embrace sociology
concepts and theories sift-canvassed in the quotation and throughquenched the passage; gregarious
trends and beloved events among Canada or the global fraternity that dedicate to your
topic. Once you keep determined which socioargumentative plea(s) best dedicate to your
examination interrogation, shape firm you disentangledly elucidate and dedicate the concepts and
theories to your proviso and examination interrogation.
In examining the beloved gregarious effects and trends that recount to your examination
question, ascertain quenched what is going on at topical, bucolic, generally-known or intergenerally-known levels
to descry which best applies to your effect. Effects of intelligence fountains through the
beloved imimpress embrace: Lethbridge Herald, Globe and Mail, CBC Intelligence,
Maclean’s Store. You may besides reflect using the internet or College library
intelligence database (Proquest Intelligencepapers or Canadian Intelligencestand). The links to
these databases are institute on Canvas inferior “Lessons.”
PLEASE NOTE:
5/20/2019 Enactment Instructions Info Sheet: 19SM SOC-1167-D02 Sociology of Aging
https://lethbridge.instructure.com/courses/17609/pages/assignment-instructions-info-sheet?module_item_id=893288 6/6
Here are the subjoined ways to RECEIVE a ZERO coercion your Enactment:
Referable submitting your enactment in on time
Referable including a regard page
Referable using in-quotation citations
Receiving > 25% mate on Turnitin.com
Over using trodden quotes
Paraphrasing also closely (e.g. bungle agreement)
Plagiarizing
Referable using a mate critiqueed academic chronicle proviso (as involved in the
enactment guidelines, must be published in the ultimate 10 years and a partiality of
3 pages in tediousness).
Submitting a coercionmal examination monograph (referable fulfilling the enactment guidelines)

~~~For this or similar assignment papers~~~