Question description

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:I. What pertinent aspects of U.S. law should the company be aware of in its goal to do business internationally?II. Assess the legal implications of moving business abroad specific to your chosen country. What are the advantages and disadvantages?III. What are the ethical implications involved in this business decision?IV. Explain how other domestic companies have managed to comply with the U.S. laws related to this business decision in the past. How did thesecompanies address potential compliance issues?mba610_final_project_part_ii_document.pdfmilestone2japan.docx

The U.S constitution homework should be interpreted narrowly to adapt to the changing times in the society. lt is a good policy for the constitution to adapt to the societal changes such as the decision in Brown v. Board of Education that gave black children equal access to quality education (Twomey, Jennings, & Greene, 2016). Original interpretation fails to understand the changing needs of the society.
Question 2: Unlike normal APA style of writing, lRAC method provides a structure for legal analysis comprising of issue, rule, application, and conclusion. Lawyers choose the lRAC tool instead of the normal way of writing because the tool helps them with a comprehensive structure for legal analysis (Hosseini, Foroumand, & Negahdari, 2015). The structure of lRAC method is also useful writing persuasive and objective legal briefs.
Question 3: The courts of original jurisdiction such as the federal district courts are court whereby the cases start. Both sides in the case are allowed to present evidence to show what occurred. On the other hand, in appellate court, the decisions made in the original courts of jurisdiction are challenged and adjudicated (Miller, 2016). No evidence and witnesses are presented in the appellate courts. ln addition, courts of original jurisdiction only one judge listens to the case, while in appellate courts, there are group of judges who listen to the argument of lawyers on the policy and legal issues.
Question 4: Mediation, arbitration, and negotiation have a common goal of fair resolution of disputes. The main difference is the approach of the methods to resolve the issues. Negotiation involves an engagement between the parties that discuss the process of settling the disputes. On the other hand, arbitration works like a court process whereby the parties involved gives testimony and evidence in an informal way (Cheeseman, 2015). ln mediation process, the discussion between the parties is done with help of a neutral external party. The parties must agree to reach an amicable solution. Arbitration is a more formal process than negotiation and mediation.
References Cheeseman, H.R (2015). Contemporary business law, 8th Edition. London, UK: Prentice Hall. Hosseini, S., Foroumand, L., & Negahdari, E. (2015). Legal approaches for improvement of business environment in lran. Journal of Exploratory Studies in Law and Management, 2(2), 127-135.
Miller, R. L. (2016). Business law today, comprehensive. Boston, MA: Cengage learning. Twomey, D. P., Jennings, M. M., & Greene, S. M. (2016).
Anderson’s Business Law and the Legal Environment, Comprehensive Volume. London, UK: Nelson Education. 57% 57%
Anderson’s Business Law and the Legal Environment, Comprehensive Volume. London, UK: Nelson Education.
– essay bishop law professionals

~~~For this or similar assignment papers~~~