CIS 500 – Information Systems for Decision-Making

CIS 500 – Information Systems for Decision-Making

Assignment 1: The CEO’s Challenge
Due Week 3 and worth 150 points
You’ve just left an all-hands meeting at your company*. The CEO was very upset at the rise of shadow IT
projects – a major indicator that the company’s internal information system has failed to meet its needs.
Because the current information system is inadequate, inefficient, and outdated, the CEO is inviting
everyone in the organization to propose a new operational, decision support, or enterprise information
system to replace it. The executives have allocated $5 million to fund the most promising idea.
This is your chance to make a difference in the company (not to mention your own career). Write your
proposal as a memo that the entire C-suite will review. Include at least these points, in your own words, to
be persuasive:
1. Identify the main functions of your proposed information system and why they are important to the
business.
2. Describe what types of data your information system will hold and how data quality will be
ensured.
3. Explain how the old information system handles the functions you mentioned, the problems that
occur, and why your information system will handle things better.
4. Offer evidence of feasibility: Show that similar information systems have been built successfully
and that they save more money than they cost.
The executives are busy, so keep your memo to 1-4 pages and avoid any extraneous content.
*You may use a current or former employer, but do not disclose anything confidential. Or, you can pick
another organization if you are familiar with their internal (not customer-facing) information systems. You
can disguise the organization and populate it with famous names. Made-up companies are problematic
because of the amount of detail and realism they require.
CIS 500 – Information Systems for Decision-Making
© 2017 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information
and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
Strayer University.
CIS 500 Page 2 of 3
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and
language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 150 Assignment 1: The CEO’s Challenge
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Identify the main
functions of your
proposed information
system and why they are
important to the
business.
Weight: 20%
(30 points)
Inadequate or no
information system
Limited information
on the system
proposed,
inadequate detail
Main functions and
importance unclear
Proposed an
information system
Somewhat
identified the main
functions
Importance of main
functions are
unclear
Proposed an
original information
system
Identified the main
functions of the
system
Explained the
importance of each
function to the
business
Explained the
stylistic choices for
architecture of
information system
Connected main
functions of system
to business needs
and shadow IT
2. Describe what types of
data your information
system will hold and how
data quality will be
ensured.
Weight: 25%
(37.5 points)
Inadequate
description of data
types
Inadequate
connection of data
storage to the
system
Inadequate
explanation of data
quality measures
Described data
types, somewhat
connected to the
system
Somewhat
explained the data
storage in system
Reasonable
explanation of data
quality measures
Described the data
types in the system
Explained how the
system would hold
each data type
Proposed how data
quality would be
ensured
Explained the
system storage and
interaction with data
Considered the
impacts of cost and
maintenance on
data quality
3. Explain how the
functions you mentioned
are being handled by the
old information system,
the problems that occur,
and why your information
system will handle things
better.
Weight: 25%
(37.5 points)
Limited description
of old system, no
explanation of
functions
Inadequate problem
identification with
old system
Limited justification
for selecting new
system over the old
one
Somewhat
explained functions
handled by the old
information system
Reasonable
description of
problems of the old
system
Reasonable
justification for how
the new system is
better than the old
Explained how the
main functions are
being handled by
the old information
system
Described the
problems of the old
system
Justified why the
new system can
handle things better
than the old system
Described why
inefficiencies of
maintenance in the
old system persist
Provided options for
keeping the system
separate,
integrating with old,
or scaling up/down
based on business
needs
CIS 500 – Information Systems for Decision-Making
© 2017 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information
and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of
Strayer University.
CIS 500 Page 3 of 3
4. Offer evidence of
feasibility: Show that
similar information
systems have been built
successfully and that
they save more money
than they cost.
Weight: 20%
(30 points)
Inadequate or
unsuccessful
system selected
Limited
demonstration of
cost savings
Inadequate defense
of the new system
to others
Identified one
similar, successful
information system
Somewhat
demonstrated cost
savings comparison
Reasonable
comparison of the
new system to other
systems
Identified similar,
successful
information systems
Demonstrated cost
savings comparison
Defended how the
new system could
operate similarly to
successful systems
Explained what
makes the
information system
identified similar to
yours
Demonstrate how
the new system
outperforms similar
systems
5. Clarity, persuasion,
proper communication,
writing mechanics, and
formatting requirements
Weight: 10%
(15 points)
Unclear structure,
not persuasive,
major grammatical
errors
Somewhat clear
structure, limited
persuasion,
grammatical errors,
language too simple
or too wordy
Clear structure,
persuasive writing,
minor or no
grammatical errors,
length and format
within requirements,
plain language
No grammatical
errors, plain
language,
organized by topic,
references business
needs, connects to
technical specs,
persuasive