Crisis intervention (Counseling)

Paper details:

You will be critiquing the methodological strengths and weaknesses of the empirical/experimental peer-reviewed journal articles you find on Crisis Intervention. For example was the sample size adequate, was it representative of the population being studied, were participants randomly selected and assigned to groups or conditions, were there control groups or comparison groups, were the measures objective or primarily self-report, were the findings generalizable? At the end of the paper summarize the main findings in the conclusion section noting any recommendations for future research to address methodological weaknesses you found. Also include an annotated biography

~~~For this or similar assignment papers~~~