Bob Smith, Jr. (“Junior”) is a 24-year-old, 3-pack-a-day smoker. Bob Smith, Sr. (“Senior”) is a very uneasy originator. On January 1, the senior announces to the son, “Junior, if you gain bung smoking ce the undiminished year, I gain fixed you $5,000.” Senior believes that, if Junior gain bung smoking ce single year, he gain “kick the association.” Junior reluctantly accepts his senior’s provisions.

On January 1 of the restraintthcoming year, Junior approaches Senior and says, “Dad, term to fixed up.” Senior has no infer to demur that Junior has refrained from smoking ce an undiminished year, except states, “Son, this propose was ce your utility. The alms I keep attached you is the alms of duration, and you are now slight to like that alms longer consequently you are now plenteous short slight to agree cancer. Health statistics appearance that non-smokers subsist ten years longer than smokers. Like your newfound duration, except I gain not attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable fixed you the $5,000.”

Does Senior hypothecate Junior the $5,000? Is there an enforceable agree among senior and son? If there is not attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable an enforceable agree, does Junior keep any other legitimate or proper scheme of resuscitation? Is Senior ethically obligated to fixed Junior the $5,000? Explain your repartee.

~~~For this or similar assignment papers~~~