BYOD: Business Opportunity or Big Headache Question 5-14 Allowing employees to use their personal smartphones for work can improve productivity and increase job satisfaction. Using BYOD enables the business to be more flexible because the company owned devices can serve on a wider range as compared to traditional mobile phones which can only be used for message transmission and messaging. BYOD increases mobility in the company especially when the employees are offered updates on their mobile technology and functionality. However, integration can cause data insecurity in the workplace. Also, the cost of managing the BYOD devices is expensive hence making it difficult to protect cooperate data. The mobile digital landscape has developed over time encompassing a variety of devices with various operating system hence companies may lack the required tools for administration and security. For instance, the Android operating system is fragmented hence making it costly and difficult for the cooperate lT to manage. Question 5-15 The managerial factor to consider before allowing the employees to use their personal mobile devices at work includes the platforms to be used and their costs. Using more than one type of mobile device requires an effective way for the company to keep track of the devices and their operating system. The organizational factors include the security of the data because the devices can be vulnerable to attacks from hackers. The technological factors involve system repairs and technical support for the variety of phones and operating systems. For example, when the employees experience difficulties in accessing data through their devices, the technical team is responsible for restoring the system to enable smooth operation (Downer et al.2015). The mobility of the BYOD systems also requires technological support in their layer of variety and complexity. Question 5-16 BYOD at Michelin worked so well because the company allows the employees to directly pay for their wireless services through an automatic registration that verifies eligibility and distributes credits directly to the employed wireless accounts. The system allows the employees to freely use their devices and cater for the expenses unlike the Rosendlin Company that only allows the employees to use cooperate provided devices. Rosendlin Company does not trust the BYOD systems for security reasons while the Michelin Company trusts its employees and offers tracking of the system to keep up with fraud activities. The experience at Michelin worked so well because the company focused on trusting their employees and making the experience effective and cost neutral. The Michelin Company, on the other hand, limits its employees by separating the company’s application with the personal applications and they also have the right to wipe out the information in the devices when the phone gets lost or broken. However, the employees have been reported to take care of the devices like personalized items. Question 5-17 Allowing the employees to use their own smartphones for work saves the company the money that could have rather been used in device supply and management. The employees use their devices for work hence the stipends and costs can be deducted from their allowance which enables the company to save money. For example, the Michelin Company provided wireless accounts for their employees to cater for the costs of service used for their jobs thus saving the company money. However, allowing BYOD requires strong security systems to prevent data theft and hackers from attacking the systems (Rose,2013). References Rose, C. (2013). BYOD: An examination of bring your own device in business. The Review of Business lnformation Systems (Online), 17(2), 65. Downer, K., & Bhattacharya, M. Kennedy, J. Marcus, S., (2015, December). BYOD security: A new business challenge. ln 2015 lEEE lnternational Conference on Smart City/SocialCom/SustainCom (SmartCity) (pp. 1128-1133). lEEE. ~~~For this or similar assignment papers~~~