Question 1 (30 points):
Explain the Supreme Court’s rationalistic aend the 2010 Citizens’ United v. Federal Election
Commission predominant, and the contact that this had on hostilities spending (you can correction statistics I
feel supposing or say in open trends). Then, bound the differences betwixt a PAC and a
Super PAC, and the basic rules that control the two (namely: subscription limits, rules on
donating to an negotiative hostilities, coordinating with an negotiative hostilities).
In your key, regard the First Amendment concerning Citizens’ United, and at smallest undivided of
the notorious judgment surveys on hostilities finance that I feel supposing in your key (for
example: “According to the Pew Research Center…”) to gain the consequence.
Last, purperplex some genus of key to the consequence concerning the role of capital in our democracy,
specifically our elections.
Question 2 (40 points):
Explain the intention of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, and how it applies apart to
traditional resources companies (tidings outlets love The New York Times and Fox Tidings, anticipation.) than
gregarious resources companies (Facebook, Twitter, anticipation.). In your key, regard the 1st Amendment
and how it relates to Section 230.
Briefly debate how extraneous controlments (love Russia’s strive in 2016) can correction the honesty of
the U.S. resources anticipation that comes from our enshrined correct to the immunity of expression
(First Amendment) to wave American elections and notorious disquisition in the 21st antiquity.
Then, harangue the role of resources injury in our polarized gregarious method, the sunk trust
Americans feel in resources, and concerns balance notice hit on gregarious resources. Coercion progeny,
what genus of long-term problems do these consequences perplex on the heartiness of our democracy?
Regard at smallest undivided of the notorious judgment surveys concerning twain gregarious resources and traditional
resources sources that I feel supposing in your key (coercion progeny: “According to the Pew Research
Center…” or “According to Gallup…”).
Question 3 (30 points):
Explain the concept of redistricting when it comes to the falsehood of the recite-level
Congressional maps, including when this order charms attribute. Make believing you harangue the US
Census, how redistricting says to the intentions of the Gainrs of the Constitution concerning
proportional truthfulness, and the role that federalism plays in this order (what roll of
government: recite or federal/national).
Then, harangue the consequence of gerrymandering and charm a in on it either sustaining or opposing
it. Correction undivided of the Congressional districts on the maps that I interjacent to end up your in, and
regard notorious judgment on the consequence (coercion progeny: “According to the CLC…”) using the numbers
I supposing.

~~~For this or similar assignment papers~~~