Part Code HI5017
Part Title Managerial Accounting
Impost Type Ordinance
Impost Title Individual Ordinance
Point of the impost (with ULO
Mapping) Tyros are required to eliminate their agreement of the point and reason of precede accounting regularitys, chiefly requireing regularitys and its reasonfulness in agreeable to managers fabricate cognizant decisions. You are to critically evaluate the literary-works (using register tenets) to analyse the skilled reason of precede accounting regularitys by coeval companies, in provisions of their union to the real-life companies’ decision-making by managers and consummation of affair goals (ULO 1,
3 & 4)
Weight 30% of the aggregate imposts
Aggregate Marks 30
Word season Referable attributable attributable attributable excite than 3,000 control. Gladden reason “word count” and grasp in the ordinance.
Attributable Continuance Week 9 Thursday 17th of September at 11.59 p.m.
Acquiescence Guidelines • Full exertion must be bestowted on Blackboard by the attributable continuance along with a entired Ordinance Cloak Page.
• The ordinance must be in MS Word restraintmat, no spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on full indelicate sides of your page with misspscope minority headings and page bulk.
• Grossusion sources must be cited in the citation of the narration, and registered misspendly at the scope in a grossusion register using Harvard advertencing fashion.
• It is the grossegiance of the tyro who is bestowting the exertion, to fix that the exertion is in truth her/his hold exertion. Incorporating another’s exertion or ideas into undivided’s hold exertion extraneously misspscope acknowledgement is an academic crime. Tyros should bestow full ordinances restraint plagiarism checking on Blackboard anteriorly terminal acquiescence in the theme. Restraint excite details, gladden advert to the Part Outline and Tyro Handbook.
HI5017 MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT T2 2020
Individual Ordinance Biasedations
Purpose:
This ordinance donation at eliminateing your agreement of the point and reason of precede accounting regularitys, in feature requireing regularitys, and its reasonfulness in agreeable to managers fabricate cognizant decisions. You are to critically evaluate the literary-works (using register tenets) to analyse the skilled reason of precede accounting regularitys by coeval companies, in provisions of their union to the real-life companies’ decision-making by managers and consummation of affair goals.
Ordinance Undertaking: You are required to precede a literary-works pursuit and critically criticism a requireing regularity in this ordinance.
Part A
Pick-out ONE of the requireing regularitys premeditated in this part from the register belowneath, and solution the questions that follow:
• Job Requireing
• Process Requireing
• Operation Requireing (Hybrid Requireing)
• Activity-domiciled Requireing (ABC)
Questions:
1. Little sift-canvass the features of your clarified requireing regularity. (3 marks)
2. Authenticate 2 biased Australian companies that your clarified requireing regularity is convenient restraint, and interpret why. (3 marks)
3. Sift-canvass couple possible reasons of the require referable attributable attributableice restraint decision-making, to the managers in each of the 2 organisations clarified in Q2 overhead. (3 marks)
Part B
Pick-out undivided fellow criticismed register season (from any dominion) on the: Reason of your clarified requireing regularity in a real-life organisation (i.e. a case-domiciled tentative con-over). The season should be published among 2005 – 2020. Pick-out your season solely controlthcoming you admit practiceed and criticismed distinct pertinent tenets, and then pick-out the best season that accomplish solution the questions belowneath.
Questions:
1. Domiciled on your clarified requireing season, little summarise how the requireing regularity was planned and implemented in your real-life organisation. (3 marks)
2. Domiciled on your clarified requireing season, did the requireing regularity in the con-over content the features sift-canvassed in
Part A (Q1)? Why or why referable attributable attributable? Grasp examples in your solution from your requireing season. (5 marks)
3. Domiciled on your clarified requireing season, how reasonful was the require referable attributable attributableice to the interior reasonrs in theorganisation? Sift-canvass with examples from your requireing season. (5 marks)
4. Domiciled on your literary-works findings, specify couple guide lessons that would apprise coeval organisationsencircling the skilled reason of your clarified requireing regularity. (5 marks)
Additional Referable attributable attributableice:
a) You are encouraged to pick-out the register season from the controlthcoming Accounting and Precede
Accounting Registers:
Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Register;
Register of Precede Accounting Learning
Register of Applied Precede Accounting Learning
b) You can practice these registers in ProQuest Axiomsbase by clicking on the overhead associates. Log in details restraint ProQuest are – Reasonrname: Holmes2004; Password: Holmes. These registers can as-courteous be practiceed via the ProQuest Axiomsbase associate aidful via the Tyro Login page in the Holmes website. You can as-courteous reason Google Scholar. Don’t reason Google.
Ordinance Structure:
The narration should grasp the controlthcoming components:
a. Ordinance cloak page evidently stating your indicate and tyro number
b. Abstract (undivided chapter)
c. Table of contents
d. A pigmy gate or overview of what the narration is encircling
e. Body of the ordinance with misspscope minority headings
f. Conclusion
g. Register of Grossusions.
Your clarified register season must be uploaded (as a different PDF perfect) concertedly with your ordinance (as a MS WORD perfect restraintmat) in Blackboard below the folder Individual Ordinance .
5 marks accomplish be deducted if you do referable attributable attributable attributable bestow the register season with your ordinance.
Academic Probity
Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding Academic Probity, as Academic Probity is gross to maintaining academic description and the tsingle of Holmes’ graduates. Accordingly, full impost undertakings need to give-in with academic probity guidelines. Table 1 identifies the six categories of Academic Probity breaches. If you admit any questions encircling Academic Probity issues kindred to your impost undertakings, gladden confer your lecturer or professor restraint pertinent advertencing guidelines and groundation media. Many of these media can as-courteous be ground through the Con-over Sills associate on Blackboard.
Academic Probity breaches are a weighty crime punishable by penalties that may rank from conclusion of marks, scarcity of the impost undertaking or part complicated, deprivation of practice enrolment, or cancellation of practice enrolment.
Table 1: Six categories of Academic Probity breaches
Plagiarism Reproducing the exertion of someundivided else extraneously attribution. When a tyro bestows their hold exertion on multiple occasions this is knhold as self-plagiarism.
Collusion Exertioning with undivided or excite other beings to entire an ordinance, in a practice that is referable attributable attributable attributable authorised.
Copying Reproducing and bestowting the exertion of another tyro, with or extraneously their cognizance. If a tyro fails to charm steady precautions to intercept their hold primordial exertion from being copied, this may as-courteous be considered an crime.
Impersonation Shamly bestowing undividedself, or interesting someundivided else to bestow as undividedself, in an in-person evidence.
Contract imposture Contracting a third laterality to entire an impost undertaking, generally in modify restraint currency or other behavior of acquittal.
Axioms fib and omission Manipulating or inventing axioms with the urgent of groundationing sham conclusions, including manipulating images.
Source: INQAAHE, 2020
Marking Criteria
Marking Criteria Weighting
Part A
1. Little sift-canvass the features of your clarified requireing regularity. 3%
2. Authenticate 2 biased Australian organisations that your clarified requireing regularity is convenient to, and interpret why. 3%
3. Sift-canvass the possible reasons of the require referable attributable attributableice restraint decision-making, to the managers in each of the 2 organisations clarified in Q2 overhead. 3%
Part B
1. Domiciled on your clarified requireing season, little summarise how the requireing regularity was planned and implemented in your real-life organisation. 3%
2. Domiciled on your clarified requireing season, did the requireing regularity in the con-over content the features sift-canvassed in Part A (Q1)? Why or why referable attributable attributable? Grasp examples in your solution from your requireing season. 5%
3. Domiciled on your clarified requireing season, how reasonful was the require referable attributable attributableice to the interior reasonrs in the organisation? Sift-canvass with examples from your requireing season. 5%
4. Domiciled on your literary-works findings, specify couple guide lessons that would apprise coeval organisations encircling the skilled reason of your clarified requireing regularity. 5%
Overfull Bestowation of Ordinance 3%
TOTAL Weight 30%
Marking Rubric
Laudable Very Amiable-natured-natured Amiable-natured Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Part A
Little sift-canvass the features of your clarified requireing regularity. (3 marks) (2.1 – 3 marks) Bestow an laudable sift-canvassion of the features of your clarified requireing regularity.
(1.9 – 2 marks) Bestow a very amiable-natured-natured sift-canvassion of the features of your clarified requireing regularity. (1.6 – 1.8 marks)
Bestow a amiable-natured-natured sift-canvassion of the features of your clarified requireing regularity. (1.1 – 1.5marks) Bestow a steady sift-canvassion of the features of your clarified requireing regularity. (0 – 1 marks)
Unable to interpret the features of your clarified requireing regularity.
Authenticate 2 biased Australian organisations that your clarified requireing regularity is convenient to, and interpret why. (3 marks) (2.1 – 3 marks) 2 biased Australian organisations attested that are conducive to your clarified requireing regularity with pure, pregnant compelling exposition to defend it. (1.9 – 2 marks) 2 biased Australian organisations attested that are conducive to your clarified requireing regularity with very amiable-natured-natured exposition to defend it. (1.6 – 1.8 marks) 2 biased Australian organisations attested that are conducive to your clarified requireing regularity with amiable-natured-natured exposition to defend it. (1.1 – 1.5marks) 2 biased Australian organisations attested that are conducive to your clarified requireing regularity with strong exposition to defend it. (0 – 1 marks)
Unable to authenticate 2 biased Australian organisations that are conducive to your clarified requireing regularity and to defend it.
Sift-canvass the possible reasons of the require referable attributable attributableice restraint decisionmaking, to the managers in each of the 2 organisations clarified in Q2 overhead.
(3 marks) (2.1 – 3 marks) Pure, pregnant, compelling sift-canvassion of the possible reasons of the require referable attributable attributableice restraint decision-making, to the managers in each of the 2 organisations clarified (1.9 – 2 marks)
A very amiable-natured-natured sift-canvassion of the possible reasons of the require referable attributable attributableice restraint decision-making, to the managers in each of the 2 organisations clarified (1.6 – 1.8 marks)
A amiable-natured-natured sift-canvassion of the possible reasons of the require referable attributable attributableice restraint decision-making, to the managers in each of the 2 organisations clarified (1.1 – 1.5marks) Strong sift-canvassion of the possible reasons of the require referable attributable attributableice restraint decision-making, to the managers in each of the 2 organisations clarified (0 – 1 marks) Unable to bestow a just sift-canvassion of the possible reasons of the require referable attributable attributableice restraint decision-making, to the managers in each of the 2 organisations clarified, or confusing.
Part B
Domiciled on your clarified requireing season, little summarise how the requireing regularity was planned and (2.1 – 3 marks) Bestow an laudable sift-canvassion of how the (1.9 – 2 marks) Bestow a very amiable-natured-natured sift-canvassion of how the (1.6 – 1.8 marks)
Bestow a amiable-natured-natured sift-canvassion of how the requireing (1.1 – 1.5marks) Bestow a steady sift-canvassion of how the (0 – 1 marks)
Unable to interpret how the requireing regularity was
HI5017 MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT T2 2020
Page 7 of 8
implemented in your real-life organisation. (3 marks)
costing regularity was planned and implemented in your real-life organisation domiciled on your requireing season.
costing regularity was planned and implemented in your real-life organisation domiciled on your requireing season. regularity was planned and implemented in your real-life organisation domiciled on your requireing season. requireing regularity was planned and implemented in your real-life organisation domiciled on your requireing season. planned and implemented in your real-life organisation domiciled on your requireing season, or confusing.
Domiciled on your clarified requireing season, did the requireing regularity in the con-over content the features sift-canvassed in Part A (Q1)? Why or why referable attributable attributable? Grasp examples in your solution from your
costing season. (5 marks)
(4.1 – 5 marks) Pure, pregnant, compelling sift-canvassion on whether the requireing regularity in the con-over content the features sift-canvassed in Part A (Q1) with examples supposing from your requireing season. (3.6 – 4 marks) Bestow a very amiable-natured-natured sift-canvassion on whether the requireing regularity in the con-over content the features sift-canvassed in Part A (Q1) with examples supposing from your requireing season. (3.1 – 3.5 marks)
Bestow a amiable-natured-natured sift-canvassion on whether the requireing regularity in the con-over content the features sift-canvassed in Part A (Q1) with examples supposing from your requireing season. (2.1 – 3 marks) Bestow a steady sift-canvassion on whether the requireing regularity in the con-over content the features sift-canvassed in Part A (Q1) with examples supposing from your requireing season. (0 – 2 marks) Unable to interpret whether the requireing regularity in the con-over content the features sift-canvassed in Part A (Q1) with stagnation of examples supposing from your requireing season, or confusing,
Domiciled on your clarified requireing season, how reasonful was the require referable attributable attributableice to the interior reasonrs in the organisation? Sift-canvass with examples from your requireing season. (5 marks) (4.1 – 5 marks) Bestow an laudable sift-canvassion of how reasonful the require referable attributable attributableice was to the interior reasonrs in the organisation with repursuit dissertation despatches aid examples from your requireing season. (3.6 – 4 marks) Bestow a very amiable-natured-natured sift-canvassion of how reasonful the require referable attributable attributableice was to the interior reasonrs in the organisation with examples from your requireing season. (3.1 – 3.5 marks)
Bestow a amiable-natured-natured sift-canvassion of how reasonful the require referable attributable attributableice was to the interior reasonrs in the organisation with examples from your requireing season. (2.1 – 3 marks) Bestow a steady sift-canvassion of how reasonful the require referable attributable attributableice was to the interior reasonrs in the organisation with examples from your requireing season. (0 – 2 marks)
Unable to interpret how reasonful the require referable attributable attributableice was to the interior reasonrs in the organisation with examples from your requireing season, or confusing.
Domiciled on your literary-works findings, specify couple guide lessons that would apprise coeval organisations encircling the skilled reason of your clarified requireing regularity. (5 marks) (4.1 – 5 marks) Pure, pregnant, compelling couple guide lessons that would apprise coeval organisations encircling the skilled reason of your clarified requireing regularity. (3.6 – 4 marks) A very amiable-natured-natured couple guide lessons that would apprise coeval organisations encircling the skilled reason of your clarified requireing regularity (3.1 – 3.5 marks) A amiable-natured-natured couple guide lessons that would apprise coeval organisations encircling the skilled reason of your clarified requireing regularity (2.1 – 3 marks)
An strong couple guide lessons that would apprise coeval organisations encircling the skilled reason of your clarified requireing regularity (0 – 2 marks)
Unable to bestow couple guide lessons that would apprise coeval organisations encircling the skilled reason of your clarified requireing regularity, or confusing.
HI5017 MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT T2 2020
Page 8 of 8
Overfull Bestowation (3 marks) (2.1 – 3 marks)
Grasp full elements and is very courteous bestowed. Despatches courses evidently and minoritys are associateed very effectively. Advertencing is wary. English is reasond very effectively and error-free. (1.9 – 2 marks) Grasp full elements and is courteous bestowed. Despatches courses evidently and minoritys are associateed effectively. Advertencing is of a elevated measure. English is reasond effectively with very scant errors bestow. (1.6 – 1.8 marks)
Grasp full elements and is generally bestowed misspendly. Despatches mainly courses courteous and minoritys are associateed. Advertencing is in agreement with guidelines. English is reasond effectively with scant errors bestow. (1.1 – 1.5marks) Grasp most elements and is strongly bestowed. Despatches casually does referable attributable attributable attributable course evidently leaving the article to look tortuous in areas. Advertencing is subordinately in agreement with guidelines. Basic English is reasond with some errors bestow. (0 – 1 marks)
Stagnation guide elements and is indisposed bestowed. Despatches does referable attributable attributable attributable course evidently leaving the article to look tortuous. Advertencing is referable attributable attributable attributable in agreement with pertinent guidelines. Basic English is reasond with errors bestow.
Aggregate Marks (30) /30
HI5017 MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT T2 2020

~~~For this or similar assignment papers~~~