I have written a research paper that I need help with the GENERAL DISCUSSION. Please read the documents I will share with you carefully and make sure to understand it before you write the general discussion. you have to report specific findings and accurate description of the studies within my research. As well as write a thoughtful 2-page disucssion. I have high expectations. To write the General Discussion, I will share with you a document. YOU MUST READ MY RESEARCH PAPER CAREFULLY! I am looking for accuracy and quality here. You have to report specific findings and write a thoughtful 2-page general discussion. I will share the document and guidelines with you once you feel competent to do this kind of work and place the bid. Otherwise, please do not. Here is a review of General Discussion Essentials: Discussion GENERAL INTENT The objective here is to provide an interpretation of your results and support for all of your conclusions, using evidence from your experiment and generally accepted knowledge, if appropriate. The significance of findings should be clearly described. WRITING A DISCUSSION Interpret your data in the discussion in appropriate depth. This means that when you explain a phenomenon you must describe mechanisms that may account for the observation. If your results differ from your expectations, explain why that may have happened. If your results agree, then describe the theory that the evidence supported. It is never appropriate to simply state that the data agreed with expectations, and let it drop at that. Decide if each hypothesis is supported, rejected, or if you cannot make a decision with confidence. Do not simply dismiss a study or part of a study as “inconclusive.” Research papers are not accepted if the work is incomplete. Draw what conclusions you can based upon the results that you have, and treat the study as a finished work You may suggest future directions, such as how the experiment might be modified to accomplish another objective. Explain all of your observations as much as possible, focusing on mechanisms. Decide if the experimental design adequately addressed the hypothesis, and whether or not it was properly controlled. Try to offer alternative explanations if reasonable alternatives exist. One experiment will not answer an overall question, so keeping the big picture in mind, where do you go next? The best studies open up new avenues of research. What questions remain? Recommendations for specific papers will provide additional suggestions. Style: When you refer to information, distinguish data generated by your own studies from published information or from information obtained from other students (verb tense is an important tool for accomplishing that purpose). Refer to work done by specific individuals (including yourself) in past tense. Refer to generally accepted facts and principles in present tense. For example, “Doofus, in a 1989 survey, found that anemia in basset hounds was correlated with advanced age. Anemia is a condition in which there is insufficient hemoglobin in the blood.” The biggest mistake that people make in discussions is to present a superficial interpretation that more or less re-states the results. It is necessary to suggest why results came out as they did, focusing on the mechanisms behind the observations. ~~~For this or similar assignment papers~~~